Norway

Norway is not part of the EU, but as an EEA Member State adopts EU policies within certain domains (nature and energy is excepted, apart from water governance). The governance hierarchy include the national, regional and local level and generally rests on the principles of ministerial responsibility and local self-governance. The county governor (Statsforvalter) has an important role in following up national policies at the regional level.
Climate change is affecting Norway’s regions differently due to a very diverse geography with the world’s second longest coastline and high variations in precipitation between the coastal and inland regions. It also includes polar climate zones and the island of Svalbard. Norway’s strategy for climate adaptation is based on the principle that the actor responsible for a task or function that will be affected by climate change is responsible for adaptation. The different authorities responsible for sectors (such as environment, health and justice and preparedness) are thus required to assess risks and the need for measures within their sector. The Norwegian environment agency is responsible for coordinating these efforts. The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) is the national authority responsible for preventing flood and landslides and mentions NBS in their guidance to flood protection. Local self-government is a strong principle in Norway, and the municipalities have a central role in climate adaptation and nature management.
The responsibility for land use planning lies at the regional and local levels in the county authority (fylkeskommune) and municipalities (kommune), authorized by the national Planning and Building Act. Conservation and protection of nature through protected areas are founded on the Nature Diversity Act which also provides provisions and principles for the sustainable management and use of ecosystems. While Norway does not implement EU policies on biodiversity, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is transposed into national legislation in the Water regulation (‘Vannforskriften’). This is an important tool for ensuring ecosystem-based and coordinated water management and provides opportunities for NBS as it requires the implementation of measures to reach targets for good ecological status of water bodies. To facilitate coordinated water management following the WFD and Water regulation, Norway is divided into several river basin districts. The river basin districts are administered by the county authority and provide water management plans and programmes of measures which are implemented locally in the river sub-basin districts with the municipalities in a central role. Norway also has large marine areas with marine management plans as strategies for ecosystem-based and sustainable management and use. While Norway has not adopted the Marine Spatial Planning Directive, an ecosystem-based management of marine ecosystems have been implemented through Ocean Management Plans in Norway. As only three per cent of Norway’s total area is arable land, soil conservation is a key principle in the agriculture policy. Norway is not part of the EU common agriculture policy, and agricultural subsidies and measures are negotiated between the state and central farmers’ unions, including a climate agreement. Different agri-environmental measures are promoted through regulations and funding schemes on regional and local level.
Examples of NBS relevant policies in Norway:
In 2018, Norway adopted a central government planning guideline for climate and energy planning and climate adaptation, founded on the Planning and Building Act. It which requires that conservation, restoration and NBS should be considered by the state, county authorities and municipalities in climate adaptation planning and justify why it has not been considered – if that is the case.
The NBS concept is becoming more familiar in Norway on all governance levels, and it is often mentioned in several recent white papers. Both the White Paper on climate change adaptation and the action plan on nature protection and biodiversity highlights the role of NBS and the authorities pledge to contribute to increased knowledge, tools and guidance on NBS. Knowledge about effects and costs related to use of NBS for flood and landslide protection is also a focus area in the white paper “A safer future – prepared for flood and landslides”.
The Biodiversity Act represents a comprehensive framework for the preservation and promotion of biological diversity in Norway. It emphasizes the integration of biodiversity considerations into all policies and decision-making processes, requiring collaboration among various sectors and levels of government. The legislation specifies that decisions affecting biodiversity must be based on knowledge and the precautionary principle.
The Norwegian Environment Agency administers several grant schemes related to climate adaptation and nature restoration that can support NBS, including grants for nature restoration and environmental measures for water bodies.

References

Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter?. Policy and Society, 38(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
Miljødirektoratet. (2024). Klimatilpasning 2024 – 2028: Strategi og handlingsplan for Miljødirektoratets resultatområder. Rapport, M-2682. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2024/januar-2024/klimatilpasning-2024--2028/
Sander, G. (2023). European approaches support an essential definition of ecosystem-based management and demonstrate its implementation for the oceans. Ocean Development & International Law, 54(4), 421-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2023.2301105

Find advice with examples from Norway here:

Applying assessment frameworks for NBS

A robust assessment framework can ensure effective monitoring and evaluation of ecological and socio-economic outcomes, collaboration, transparency, and enables comparison across initiatives.

Carry out cost-benefit analysis considering the Total Economic Value of NBS

Analysing the Total Economic Value of NBS highlights their long-term benefits, including ecosystem services and helps policymakers and investors recognize NBS as cost-effective and scalable.

Collaborate with research institutions and other knowledge-producing actors

Promoting engagement and collaboration with local research institutes and other knowledge-producing actors such as NGOs can lead to better understanding of NBS impacts and wider outreach.

Collaborations across municipalities with common challenges

To overcome challenges with lack of resources, time, or expertise to apply NBS, municipalities with common challenges should utilise existing arenas for collaboration.

Earmark funds to support NBS in agriculture

Earmarking funds for NBS within financial support programmes for agriculture is one way to encourage NBS within the productive landscape.

Establish interdisciplinary networks within public administrations

Interdisciplinary networks on specific NBS-related topics such as stormwater management or natural hazards can lead to a more cohesive and effective implementation of measures.

Financial support for integrating NBS in local policies

Allocating a dedicated budget specifically to support local efforts to prioritize NBS can significantly accelerate the adoption of NBS across municipalities.

Governmental grants to facilitate expansion and restoration projects for NBS

Grants directed at municipalities, NGOs and businesses can play a crucial role in mainstreaming and scaling up restoration projects, as financing remains a main barrier.

Guidance and strategies for plant selection in NBS

Providing guidance regarding plant selection in restoration and protection oriented NBS can underpin the protection of local biodiversity and limit spreading of harmful, invasive species.

Increase capacity building for key public local actors

Implementing NBS in local strategies and projects calls for capacity building for public workers across several sectors, and can be especially relevant in smaller municipalities with fewer resources.

Integrating NBS in local planning policy

Integrating NBS on the strategic level for planning in municipalities, can enable use of NBS locally, both on public and private property.

Integrating NBS in national land-use planning policy

Integrating NBS in national planning policy enables and encourages municipalities to include NBS in their municipal master plans, zoning plans and other important planning documents.

Involving citizens through community programmes for NBS

Citizen engagement through community-based programmes, citizen science and NBS activities helps spreading awareness, contribute to social learning and gain confidence in NBS actions.

Look for NBS opportunities when planning infrastructure projects

To overcome challenges with lack of funding and space to apply NBS, public authorities can capitalise on large infrastructure projects by making funding or integration of NBS mandatory.

Strengthening nature protection legislation

Protected areas are still under pressure. Focusing on enforcement of restrictions to ensure the effectiveness of nature protection is fundamental.

Training programs for contractors

Including NBS in education relevant for becoming a contractor, or promoting in-service training on NBS for these professionals, can promote appropriate use and quality of NBS in construction projects

Utilise planning tools for green and blue-green infrastructure

Existing planning tools, such as blue-green factor and guidelines for green structure can be adapted and supplemented to integrate NBS into zoning planning.

Zoning overhaul: Revising local zoning plans to prioritise nature

Updating or repealing old zoning plans can help municipalities in their strategy to use nature to address societal challenges and make building applications processing more efficient.